Filter by
Search
Search Keywords
- Lawsuit challenges county law forcing officiant to create vows, pray over same-sex weddings if she celebrates marriage between one man and one woman
- ADF attorneys ask university to address unconstitutional retaliation against student ousted from leadership for private texts sharing concerns about the ACLU, other organizations
- Activists shut down world-renowned economist Art Laffer’s scheduled lecture, university supports hostile mob, punishes conservatives
- ADF attorneys represent New Hope Family Services
- River Falls campus will no longer forbid student conversation without advance permission, student group recognition
- Victory for Orthodox Jewish counselor who sued to protect his First Amendment freedoms
- High court orders circuit court to reconsider its decision against March for Life in light of ruling upholding same HHS rules in other cases
- The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Thursday to take a case filed by Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys on behalf of two former college students seeking to vindicate their constitutionally protected freedoms.
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday upholding U.S. Department of Health and Human Services rules which protect organizations with religious or moral objections to abortion, such as Little Sisters of the Poor, from being subject to a federal requirement that employer health plans cover abortifacients: “The government has no business forcing pro-life and religious organizations to provide drugs and devices that can destroy life. HHS designed ...
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday affirming the freedom of religious schools to determine who teaches their faith: “As the Supreme Court has made clear in the past and has now made clear again, the First Amendment bars the government from interfering with a religious group’s employment decisions regarding its ministers. The court’s decision today clears up disagreements in the lower courts about the right way to define ‘minister,’ ...