Filter by
Search
Search Keywords
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding the U.S. Department of Justice’s friend-of-the-court brief filed Wednesday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit in A.M. v. French opposing Vermont’s discrimination against students based on the religious status of the high schools they attend: “As the United States argues in its brief filed Wednesday, no state can discriminate against students based on which kind of school they attend. It makes no sense for Vermont to say it will pay ...
- ADF attorneys represent two female athletes who support law, oppose ACLU lawsuit that seeks to deny opportunities to women, girls
- ADF letters on behalf of Young Americans for Liberty results in additional policy changes, at schools in AL, MN, PA, SC
- Appeals court cites US Supreme Court’s decision in Montana case
- Over 300 NCAA, professional athletes sign letter supporting Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act
- ADF attorneys ask university to address unconstitutional retaliation against student ousted from leadership for private texts sharing concerns about the ACLU, other organizations
- Activists shut down world-renowned economist Art Laffer’s scheduled lecture, university supports hostile mob, punishes conservatives
- River Falls campus will no longer forbid student conversation without advance permission, student group recognition
- The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Thursday to take a case filed by Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys on behalf of two former college students seeking to vindicate their constitutionally protected freedoms.
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday affirming the freedom of religious schools to determine who teaches their faith: “As the Supreme Court has made clear in the past and has now made clear again, the First Amendment bars the government from interfering with a religious group’s employment decisions regarding its ministers. The court’s decision today clears up disagreements in the lower courts about the right way to define ‘minister,’ ...