Search

… methods on all women. Read on to learn more about the case. Who is Dr. Cami Jo Tice-Harouff? Dr. Cami Jo … attorneys’ fees as part of the settlement of the lawsuit. Case timeline December 2021 : HRSA removed a requirement for …

Rory Gray, Esq., serves as senior counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom, where he plays a strategic role on the Appellate Advocacy Team.

… Bahnsen at Chase Bank’s annual shareholder meeting on May 16. A longtime shareholder at Chase, Bahnsen—who serves on … garnered national media attention, including a front-page story at The Wall Street Journal . The Business Index … the fundamental freedoms of those they serve—or in the case of shareholders like Bahnsen, of those who own them. …

… at its disposal to help these children find loving homes? Case timeline April 2019 : ADF filed a lawsuit  on behalf of … Care … How One Ministry Responded … 16294 … Michigan … case:Catholic Charities West Michigan v. Michigan Department …

… from the university. Read on to learn more about this case. What is Arizona Christian University? Arizona Christian … to partner once again with ACU’s student-teachers.” Case timeline February 2023 : The Washington Elementary …

… the same day the Supreme Court agreed to hear Jack’s first case in June 2017, a local attorney and LGBT activist … day the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear Jack’s first case in June 2017, Autumn Scardina, a local attorney and LGBT … held that complaint until Jack’s first Masterpiece case was decided in June 2018. But just days after the …

… ruled in favor of free speech in Lorie Smith’s landmark case, 303 Creative v. Elenis. Written by Alliance Defending … our beliefs without fear of government punishment. Lorie’s case, 303 Creative v. Elenis , made it all the way to the … to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed to hear her case and heard oral argument in December 2022. And in June …

… commonwealth’s prohibition on the practice and argued the case in court—an atheist academic also filed a brief … The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review the case alongside Washington v. Glucksberg , another case in which physicians were challenging a state’s …

WPATH styles itself as the authority on so-called ‘gender medicine.’ But leaked documents show that its standards of care are neither scientific nor ethical.

An English doctor’s expert review revealed major concerns about what is misleadingly called “gender-affirming care.”