Skip to content
Image
girl with bandaid on arm

Get Information about Religious Exemptions to COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate

At Alliance Defending Freedom, we focus our legal work in five core areas: religious freedom, freedom of speech, sanctity of life, marriage and family, and parental rights. ADF takes no position on the COVID-19 vaccine. However, we have filed litigation against the Biden administration over its vaccine mandate regarding private businesses and nonprofits, including those who are religious, because, whether vaccinated or not, government overreach hurts all of us. It’s not the role of the federal government to mandate that private employers and religious organizations choose between complying with the vaccine mandate or terminating their employees.

Notwithstanding the overreach of the mandate, it is still subject to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Title VII entitles employees to request accommodations from the employer’s directives that would violate the employee’s sincerely-held religious beliefs. While ADF’s litigation argues that the vaccine mandate is unconstitutional, until that issue is settled by the courts, we have created this resource page to help private employers, churches, religious nonprofits, and individuals navigate the legal landscape related to religious objections to vaccine mandates.

If you are a church or religious nonprofit with 100 or more employees, we encourage you to join ADF’s Church Alliance or Ministry Alliance. As a member, you will receive religious liberty-focused legal help that is tailored to the needs of your organization and the latest challenges to your freedom, including the Biden administration’s vaccine mandate.

SUMMARY GUIDANCE FOR RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS AND EXEMPTIONS FROM COVID-19 VACCINATION MANDATES*

*Caveat: This Summary Guidance is provided merely as a courtesy and is not intended to provide legal information or advice to any person or entity. The information provided herein should not be used except in conjunction with the individualized advice of legal counsel familiar with the user’s specific situation. This is a fluid and rapidly changing area of the law, and, therefore, the accuracy of the information contained herein should always be verified by independent research.

    • According to the Biden administration’s OSHA mandate (which ADF is currently challenging), employers who have 100 or more employees at any time while the mandate is in effect must require their employees who work on-site to, either:
      • Get vaccinated against COVID-19, or
      • Undergo regular COVID-19 testing and wear a face covering at work.
    • Covered employers who adopt a mandatory vaccination policy must still consider legitimate Title VII religious accommodation requests and ADA medical accommodation requests to the mandate.
    • The mandate requires covered employers to:
      • Determine the vaccination status of each employee, obtain acceptable proof of vaccination status from vaccinated employees, and maintain records and a roster of each employee’s vaccination status.
      • Require employees to provide prompt notice when the employee tests positive for COVID-19 or receives a COVID-19 diagnosis, and remove such employees from the workplace, regardless of vaccination status.
      • Ensure that each employee who is not fully vaccinated is tested for COVID-19 at least weekly (if the worker is in the workplace at least once a week) or within seven days before returning to work (if the worker is away from the workplace for a week or longer.) Employers are not required to cover the cost of COVID-19 testing.
      • Ensure that each employee who has not been fully vaccinated wears a face covering when indoors or when occupying a vehicle with another person for work purposes. Employers are not required to pay for face coverings.
    • The mandate requires covered employers to comply with most of its requirements by December 5, 2021 and with testing requirements by January 4, 2022.
    • Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, prohibits many private and government employers from discriminating against their employees on the basis of—among other things—religion. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.
    • Title VII entitles an employee to request exemptions from the employer’s directives that would violate the employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j).
    • Employers imposing vaccination mandates must recognize legitimate requests from their employees to be exempted from such vaccination programs based upon the objecting employee’s sincerely held religious beliefs, unless to do so would impose an undue hardship on the employer. What constitutes an undue hardship may depend on the work setting at issue.
    • Religious accommodation requests should be in writing and clearly articulate the religious basis for the accommodation request. Religious accommodation requests should avoid asserting non-religious objections to the vaccines or the vaccination program, such as health, medical, or political objections.
    • It is inappropriate for an employer to demand that an employee support their religious accommodation request with statements from the employee’s church or clergy.
    • Conduct of an employee that appears to be inconsistent with the religious beliefs underlying the employee’s religious objection to the COVID-19 vaccines may undermine the employee’s religious accommodation request. E.g., the employee asserts a religious objection to a COVID-19 vaccine on the ground that his body is the “temple of the Holy Spirit” but ingests other medications, foods, or substances with potentially harmful effects.
    • Employers who grant religious accommodations might be able to require unvaccinated employees to wear masks, socially distance, undergo COVID-19 testing, telework, or be reassigned. EEOC, What You Should Know About COVID-19 and the ADA, the Rehabilitation Act, and Other EEO LawsTechnical Assistance Questions and Answers (updated May 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/wysk/what-you-should-know-about-covid-19-and-ada-rehabilitation-act-and-other-eeo-laws.
    • Generally speaking, mandatory student vaccination programs are not unconstitutional and do not violate the religious free exercise rights of either the students or the students’ parents.
    • Students may be entitled to a religious exemption from a mandatory student vaccination program if:
    • the school voluntarily offers religious exemptions;
    • there is a state statute providing students with religious exemptions; or
    • the student vaccination program provides non-religious exemptions to students, but not religious exemptions.
    • Although the fluidity of the COVID-19 pandemic and related government restrictions has resulted in an evolving legal landscape over the last 18 months, the Supreme Court has established that government mandates that treat church gatherings worse than similar non-religious activities are unconstitutional. Legal challenges based on disparate treatment of churches and comparable secular activities have been successful in the COVID-19 context (and other contexts). Thus, churches may want to consider challenging any vaccination requirements that treat church gatherings less favorably than similar non-religious activities.
    • Some churches are receiving questions from their members about supporting a member’s religious objection to an employer or school vaccine mandate. Under the law generally, religious objectors cannot be required to provide supporting statements from clergy, and thus such a letter is not a necessary component of an accommodation request. Nonetheless, such a letter can be helpful in some circumstances.
    • Clergy should exercise care when asked to provide a letter in support of someone’s religious objections to COVID-19 vaccines. As discussed elsewhere in this Summary, a religious accommodation request must be based on religious concerns, not medical, health, cultural, or political concerns. The pastor or priest should ensure that the church member has a bona fide religious objection to the vaccine. In addition, unless the clergy statement will, in fact, support the objector’s religious beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines, such a statement may actually harm the objector’s request. (Under the law, it is the objector’s personal religious beliefs that are at issue, which is why employers are legally not permitted to inquire whether church doctrine supports the objector’s religious belief. Nonetheless, if the objector voluntarily includes a clergy letter in support of her accommodation request, the letter may harm the objector’s position if it contradicts or only equivocally supports her stated religious belief.)
    • Because every religious objector’s case is different, it is not possible to provide clergy with specific advice on how best to handle individual requests without knowing the specific facts of each case. However, clergy and churches may obtain the advice of a religious liberty attorney on letters supporting specific religious accommodation requests, and other matters pertaining to protection of the church’s religious liberty, by joining ADF’s Church Alliance. For information concerning the ADF Church Alliance, visit us at: https://adflegal.org/about-us/alliance-programs.
    • The U.S. military recognizes that service members have the right to observe the tenets of their religion. DoD Instruction 1300.17—Religious Liberty in the Military Services.
    • Active-duty service members have the right to request a religious accommodation from a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination program established and administered by the U.S. military.
    • Section 3 of DoD Instruction 1300.17 sets forth the procedures for service members requesting religious accommodations, how such requests are reviewed, factors for consideration, and appeal processes.
    • An active-duty service member facing a general or special court martial will be appointed military counsel, at no cost to the service member. However, a service member also has the right, at the service member’s expense, to hire civilian legal counsel of the service member’s own choosing. 10 U.S.C. § 838(b)(2), (3) and (4).

Questions about Mandatory Masking

  • First, you must ensure that you have a bona fide religious objection. Few, if any, religions have specific teachings against wearing masks. You must be able to articulate a religious belief that the mask requirement violates. Medical, cultural, or political objections do not qualify as a bona fide religious objection. Some plaintiffs have sued based on religious objections to wearing masks in public, but courts have rejected those to date.

Questions about Mandatory Vaccination

  • Courts have ruled for over a century that the government may require mandatory vaccines in certain circumstances. Religious objectors may be entitled to accommodations in some circumstances. For more information on mandatory vaccines in employment and education, see the document entitled “Summary Guidance for Religious Accommodations and Exemptions from COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates” on our website and the additional FAQs below.

  • Not in most circumstances. Private employers and private schools are not subject to the First Amendment. Even in cases where a government employer or public school may require you to disclose your vaccination status, it would not likely be considered compelled speech under the First Amendment.

  • In most situations, employers or schools that provide such religious accommodations are legally permitted to do so. However, if you experience actual repeated and severe harassment in the workplace based specifically on your religious beliefs, you may have claims based on workplace harassment. But feeling singled out, without more, is unlikely to violate the law.

Questions about Employment & Education

  • You must first determine if your objection is based on a sincerely held religious belief against taking any of the available vaccines (since they are different), or whether your objections are based on other medical, health, cultural, or political, but not religious, concerns. Many people have medical or other concerns which do not rise to the level of an actual religious belief. A belief that taking a vaccine is unwise or could be harmful will normally be considered a medical or health objection, not a religious objection.

    Private employers. Private employers may generally impose work-related job requirements on their employees so long as the requirements do not violate the law. However, if an employer institutes a policy requiring its employees to take a vaccine, and to take the vaccine would violate your sincerely held religious beliefs, the employer may be required to grant you a reasonable accommodation if it can do so without incurring an undue hardship. A reasonable accommodation may include a mask or social distance requirement, temperature checks, COVID-testing, reassignment, or other measures.

    Government employers. Government employers may also have to grant reasonable accommodations to their employees who have sincerely held religious beliefs that conflict with the employer’s policies or directives, just as private employers do. In addition, unlike private employees, government employers must also respect the constitutional rights of their employees. So a government employee may also have constitutional rights to avoid the government employer’s vaccine mandates. For example, if a government employer offers any exemptions to a mandatory vaccine requirement, then the Constitution may require that it also offer an exemption for religious reasons.

  • You must first determine if your objection is based on a sincerely held religious belief against taking any of the available vaccines (since they are different), or whether your objections are based on other medical, health, cultural, or political, but not religious, concerns. Many people have medical or other concerns which do not rise to the level of an actual religious belief. A belief that taking a vaccine is unwise or could be harmful will normally be considered a medical or health objection, not a religious objection.

    If you do have 1) a sincerely held religious objection to taking all vaccines, or 2) a specific, sincerely held belief rooted in your faith that taking these particular COVID-19 vaccines would violate your sincerely held religious beliefs in a way that you can articulate, then you may be entitled to request an accommodation, depending on the situation. You should also first check to see if any other objections to the vaccines are permitted, such as medical exemptions, or pregnancy. If you receive an accommodation, you should be willing to accept other requirements such as wearing a mask, temperature checks, and/or regular COVID-testing.

Non-Religious Accommodations and Exemptions

  • It depends on your situation. Employers and schools sometimes offer accommodations and exemptions for reasons other than sincerely held religious beliefs, most commonly health accommodations or exemptions for employees and students who have medical conditions that put them at particular risk if they are required to receive a vaccine. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) also has a medical accommodation provision similar to Title VII’s religious accommodation in employment provision.

If you believe you have a bona fide religious objection to a COVID-19 vaccine required by your employer or your child’s school, you can submit a request for legal assistance or call 800-835-5233.