When concerns over COVID-19 first began, Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley voluntarily began conducting services virtually, before Nevada Governor Steve Sisolak imposed a hard cap of fifty people maximum for churches and other religious gatherings.
And while churches in the state were capped at 50 people, the state’s world-famous casinos were being treated far more favorably, allowed to welcome hundreds to thousands of visitors up to half their buildings’ capacity.
As the months dragged on, the spiritual toll of the pandemic grew. Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley wanted to hold in-person services and be treated at least as good as casinos, including the one about four miles away from the church.
So, Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit on Calvary Chapel’s behalf.
Even though Governor Sisolak later raised the hard cap on churches from 50 people to 250, the unequal treatment of religious versus secular gatherings still remains. Casinos, amusement parks, and bars are still allowed to have half capacity without the 250 people hard cap imposed on churches.
That’s why ADF attorneys have once again asked the U.S. Supreme Court to correct this unconstitutional treatment of churches.
This is the second time that Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley has asked the Supreme Court to step in. In July, at an earlier stage of its lawsuit, the church filed an emergency motion at the Supreme Court.
Unfortunately, at that point, a slim majority of the U.S. Supreme Court declined to halt the unfair treatment of churches in Nevada. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh vigorously dissented from the order denying an emergency injunction pending appeal.
As Justice Alito explained in dissent: “The Constitution guarantees the free exercise of religion. It says nothing about the freedom to play craps or blackjack, to feed tokens into a slot machine, or to engage in any other game of chance.” The dissenting justices would have immediately stopped the unconstitutional treatment.
And now they have a second chance to do so.
In its petition to the Court, ADF attorneys highlight further examples of Nevada’s unequal treatment of religious gatherings:
- On the protests in Nevada earlier this year, the Governor’s COVID order meant “more than 50 people could gather to lift their voices and plea for justice—but only if their prayers and petitions were directed toward their government, not God.”
- “The Governor sanctioned boisterous crowds waiting for long periods to board popular theme-park attractions…at the same time he prohibited more than 50 people from (mainly) sitting quietly and socially-distanced at church. “
Perhaps Justice Alito said it best in his dissent:
“The idea that allowing Calvary Chapel to admit 90 worshippers presents a greater public health risk than allowing casinos to operate at 50% capacity is hard to swallow, and the State’s efforts to justify the discrimination are feeble.”
Learn more about how your church can support this church and others harmed by government overreach during COVID-19.
Get the facts on Thomas More Law Center v. Bonta, a donor privacy case decided at the U.S. Supreme Court.
Chike Uzuegbunam was punished for speaking on Georgia Gwinnett College’s campus. His case went all the to the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Biden administration has implemented or is seeking to implement multiple regulations that would severely restrict religious freedom.