Skip to main content
Hero Image
Blog

4 Reasons Government Shouldn't Force These Farmers to Violate Their Faith

October 17, 2017
By: Emily Conley

When Cynthia’s phone rang that September evening in 2012, she was prepared for a usual inquiry about using the farm for a wedding ceremony. Nothing could have prepared her for what ultimately followed: a demand from the state that they violate their faith to host a same-sex ceremony in their own home.

A few weeks ago, we introduced you to Rob and Cynthia Gifford, the couple who were fined $13,000 for politely declining to host a same-sex marriage ceremony on their property. Thursday, October 2nd, Alliance Defending Freedom allied attorney Jim Trainor filed a petition in New York state court asking for review of a New York State Division of Human Rights decision. The government should not force people to violate their faith, and in this case, force people to choose between their faith and their business, for several reasons:
  • The government shouldn’t have the power to force people to do something they believe is wrong in their own home or backyard.

As ADF allied attorney Jim Trainor said: “The Constitution prohibits the state from forcing people to promote a message that violates their religious beliefs and conscience. Particularly disturbing is that, in this instance, it’s happening in someone’s own home.”

  • The Giffords didn’t discriminate against the couple.

They made it clear that the women were welcome to any other events on the farm and were willing to host the wedding reception. They turned down the ceremony, which they could not in good conscience host.

  • The commissioner did not consider Robert and Cynthia’s constitutional freedoms and religious beliefs.

 During the proceedings, the judge never addressed the Giffords’ First Amendment rights of freedom of religion, speech, or expression. These are fundamental freedoms for all Americans.

  • Equating racial discrimination with the marriage issue is misleading.

Mariko Hirose, the attorney for the same-sex couple, was quoted by the Religion News Service as follows: “All New Yorkers are entitled to their own religious beliefs, but businesses cannot discriminate based on sexual orientation any more than they can based on race or national origin.”  But acting publically on the basis of religious belief in marriage as it has always existed cannot be compared to  race-based segregation, and equating the two is misleading.

The fines include $10,000 to the state and $3,000 in “mental anguish” fees to the couple. And as in the case of Jack Phillips of Masterpiece Cakeshop, the state requires the Giffords and their staff to be “reeducated.” Take Action “I fully believe that God blessed this country, for freedom to speech and religion. And we have to stand up for that, and always fight for that,” - Cynthia Gifford, Daily Signal Share the Gifford’s story – it makes a difference! Too many people today believe that changing the legal definition of marriage won’t affect them, and this is simply not true.  Engage in healthy, respectful discussion on social media and in the comments below. Marriage is good for society, and so is respectful debate.

Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom

Non-profit organization

Alliance Defending Freedom advocates for your right to freely live out your faith


Religious Freedom

How One Mother Took a Stand for Her Child’s Rights

Most mothers can think of a moment when they needed to stand up for their child. For Jennifer, that moment came when she picked up her daughter, Lydia, from school last fall.

Religious Freedom

The Equality Act Risks the Rights of Every American

What many supporters of the bill won't tell you is that if passed, the Equality Act would pave the way for dangerous policies which could undermine fairness and freedom.

Religious Freedom

Why Two Female Athletes in Idaho Joined a Legal Battle Over a State Law

Female athletes deserve a voice in this lawsuit and the opportunity to protect women’s sports in Idaho.