Filter by
Search
Search Keywords
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed their opening brief Monday with the U.S. Supreme Court in a lawsuit challenging a California law that forces pro-life pregnancy care centers to provide free advertising for the abortion industry.
- The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to disturb a state law protecting Mississippians against government discrimination, leaving in place a U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruling which concluded in June of last year that the law’s opponents didn’t demonstrate they have been or will be harmed by the law.
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing cake artist Jack Phillips filed their final brief Wednesday prior to oral arguments at the U.S. Supreme Court in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission.
- ADF client in Supreme Court case honored at Weyrich 2017 Awards Dinner
- U.S. Supreme Court says federal law against organized crime does not apply to pro-life advocates
- ADF official comment
- Case sent back to lower court to decide whether town ordinance unconstitutionally favors non-commercial signs that aren’t religious
- Town of Gilbert amends sign code but perpetuates discrimination against churches; ADF amends lawsuit on behalf of church
- ADF attorneys secure fair treatment for Gilbert church, town council to amend unfair signage ordinance
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Austin R. Nimocks regarding the California Supreme Court’s decision Wednesday in Hollingsworth v. O’Connell to deny the petition to uphold the state’s voter-approved marriage amendment: “Elected officials should enforce the law. Though the current California officials are unwilling to enforce the state constitution, we remain hopeful that one day Californians will elect officials who will. It is unfortunate that the California Supreme Court chose not to decide the important, still-unresolved questions about the ...