Filter by
Search
Showing 1759 results for "no meetings christians ohio civic center"
- … her family’s savings, retirement funds, and home. It’s no wonder that so many people are rightly calling on … for Barronelle and so many other Americans, and because no executive order can fix all of the threats to that … her family’s savings, retirement funds, and home. It’s no wonder that so many people are rightly calling on …
- ADF submits formal comments to U.S. Dept. of Education opposing proposed changes, defending women, parental rights, free speech
- … you don’t have to agree with Jack’s views to agree that no one should be compelled to express messages they don’t … you don’t have to agree with Jack’s views to agree that no one should be compelled to express messages they don’t …
- ADF: First Jack Phillips, then Barronelle Stutzman, now Lorie Smith; how many more?
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President for Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding a unanimous decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit Wednesday in Billard v. Charlotte Catholic High School, in which a Catholic high school was challenged by a former employee who entered into a relationship that conflicted with the school’s religious beliefs about marriage and sexuality. ADF attorneys filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of religious employers who wish to make hiring decisions without fear of government ...
- … explicitly on ‘sex.’ If, as a matter of law, ‘sex’ is no longer understood to be an immutable characteristic, but … Counsel Rachel Rouleau serves as legal counsel for the Center for Conscience Initiatives with Alliance Defending … explicitly on ‘sex.’ If, as a matter of law, ‘sex’ is no longer understood to be an immutable characteristic, but …
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of U.S. Litigation David Cortman regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Friday in Tandon v. Newsom to halt California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s COVID-19 order that limits religious gatherings to three households inside of personal residences while allowing more than three households to gather in other comparable venues: “With this fifth rejection of California’s COVID-19 restrictions on religious exercise, the Supreme Court has made abundantly clear that the government has a duty to respect ...
- … you don’t have to agree with Jack’s views to agree that no one should be compelled to express ideas and messages they … you don’t have to agree with Jack’s views to agree that no one should be compelled to express ideas and messages they …
- Stutzman: ‘I’ve never had to compromise my conscience or go against my faith’
- Dissenting judge called decision ‘unprecedented,’ ‘staggering’ in scope for giving officials more authority to regulate speech as it becomes more expressive