Filter by
Search
Showing 2008 results for "wash floral artists home savings still risk after court judgment"
- … filed Vick v. Putnam County with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Nathan Dowlen of … filed Vick v. Putnam County with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee. Nathan Dowlen of …
- … to allow in public debate ADF attorneys file friend-of-the-court brief with 11th Circuit in free speech case Published … Freedom attorneys filed a proposed friend-of-the-court brief Monday with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, urging it to reject …
- ADF letters on behalf of Young Americans for Liberty results in additional policy changes, at schools in AL, MN, PA, SC
- … lawsuit, Dobson v. Sebelius , filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, argues that the mandate … lawsuit, Dobson v. Sebelius , filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado, argues that the mandate …
- … to protect girls’ sports ADF attorneys file friend-of-the-court brief in defense of Indiana law that preserves … representing seven female athletes filed a friend-of-the-court brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit Tuesday in support of …
- … A. McDonald and Bonnie L. Rutledge , in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont. Byrne submitted his … A. McDonald and Bonnie L. Rutledge , in the U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont. Byrne submitted his …
- … Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman. “We are asking the court to halt the unconstitutional harassment of Gideons … Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman. “We are asking the court to halt the unconstitutional harassment of Gideons …
- … Pearson v. City of Stayton , filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, ADF attorneys argue that … Pearson v. City of Stayton , filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, ADF attorneys argue that …
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Christiana Kiefer regarding the U.S. Department of Education’s proposed rule published Thursday that interprets Title IX of the Civil Rights Act in a manner inconsistent with the plain meaning of that law to illegitimately inject it with the administration’s political preferences, thereby disregarding a wide range of constitutionally protected freedoms: “Fifty years ago, Congress acted to protect equal opportunity for women by passing Title IX. Now, by radically rewriting federal law, the Biden administration is ...
- … The letter cites pertinent legal precedent, including court rulings that support the ability of public schools to … The letter cites pertinent legal precedent, including court rulings that support the ability of public schools to …