Filter by
Search
Search Keywords
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Chris Schandevel regarding a friend-of-the-court brief ADF attorneys filed on behalf of several pro-life and religious medical associations Friday in State of Tennessee v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. The case involves a Biden administration rule that requires recipients of Title X funds to counsel and refer for abortions: “The rights of conscience are at the core of our constitutional freedoms, and forcing medical professionals to violate their ...
- ADF attorneys favorably settle lawsuit on behalf of two churches, three religious schools, pregnancy center network
- ADF attorneys represent Christian Employers Alliance
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel Matt Bowman, director of regulatory practice, regarding a rule the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services published Tuesday, Safeguarding the Rights of Conscience as Protected by Federal Statutes: “Americans shouldn’t be forced to violate their ethical and religious beliefs. Yet, every year, countless medical practitioners needlessly suffer threats to their livelihoods and affronts to their faith just for asserting their rights to conscience and religious freedom. In its rule, HHS suggests it will continue ...
- 5th Circuit blocks abuse of federal law, rules to protect emergency rooms from govt overreach
- Free-speech advocates unite in support of Masterpiece Cakeshop
- ADF attorneys available for media interviews following oral arguments Thursday
- ADF attorneys favorably settle lawsuit on behalf of Country Mill Farms, owner Steve Tennes
- ADF attorneys available for media interviews following hearing Thursday
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Counsel and Vice President of Appellate Advocacy John Bursch regarding the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision Monday not to hear Tingley v. Ferguson, a case challenging Washington state’s counseling censorship law: “We’re disappointed that Washington’s Counseling Censorship Law will continue to prevent many people from getting the help they need. The law clearly violates the First Amendment by censoring counselors like Brian, and that ultimately hurts his clients. Washington forces counselors to tell their clients that there ...