Search

The Biden administration is wreaking havoc on Title IX. Title IX was passed in 1972 to protect equal opportunities for women, not harm them. Now, the administration has issued a radical change that redefines “sex” in federal law to include “gender identity.” This means that “sex,” under federal law, would be based on how someone identifies, not biological reality. These changes gut equal opportunities for women, erode student privacy, and threaten women’s sports and safety. The Biden administration claims that this radical change won’t affect women’s opportunities. But the government can’t ...

The government is pressuring Big Tech to censor speech. It’s trying to determine how Americans think by pressuring tech corporations to filter beliefs. That’s blatantly illegal. And the stakes are so high. Your gift today will help hold the administration responsible and reaffirm free speech for everyone. Every dollar you give to Alliance Defending Freedom makes an immediate impact. Right now, thanks to a generous matching grant, your gift today will be DOUBLED—dollar for dollar—up to $500,000, while matching funds last! Thank you in advance for your generosity. With your support, we will ...

… in 1973 following the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion in all 50 states. Every … Life Education and Defense Fund v. California In 2012, the Obama administration’s Department of Health and Human …

The Biden administration is wreaking havoc on Title IX. Title IX was passed in 1972 to protect equal opportunities for women, not harm them. Now, the administration has issued a radical change that redefines “sex” in federal law to include “gender identity.” This means that “sex,” under federal law, would be based on how someone identifies, not biological reality. These changes gut equal opportunities for women, erode student privacy, and threaten women’s sports and safety. The Biden administration claims that this radical change won’t affect women’s opportunities. But the government can’t ...

… Alliance Defending Freedom client Chelsea Mitchell ( Soule v. Connecticut Association of Schools ) about the injustice … … women's rights … transgender … LGBT … Case:Soule v. Connecticut Association of Schools … Connecticut …

… as the U.S. Supreme Court said in the 1819 case McCulloch v. Maryland , “the power to tax involves the power to … for churches is the 1970 Supreme Court case Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York . Frederick Walz, a … Unfortunately, another significant case, Branch Ministries v. Rossotti , set a dangerous precedent for government …

Three women’s swim team captains at Roanoke College were forced to fight for the protection of their sport and their team.

… be Able to Override Idaho’s Life-Saving Law? … Idaho v. United States Survey …

… Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in a case called Reed v. Reed , one of its first women’s rights cases. In the …

… designer Lorie Smith at the Supreme Court in 303 Creative v. Elenis . Lorie runs 303 Creative, a website design studio. … everyone sees it that way. In Christian Healthcare Centers v. Nessel , for example, ADF represents a Michigan … its beliefs. Likewise, in State of Texas and Mayo Pharmacy v. HHS , ADF represents Mayo Pharmacy, a pharmacy in North …