Skip to main content
Hero Image
Blog

3 Times Judicial Nominees Were Attacked for Their Faith—And Why That’s a Problem

October 16, 2020

Can a person of faith still serve as a faithful judge? It seems that some of our government officials don’t think so.

Here are just a few examples. 

1. Senator Kamala Harris’ attacks on judicial nominee Brian Buescher. 

When Buescher was nominated as a U.S. district court judge, Senator Harris attacked him for his involvement in the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic charitable organization with millions of members. The organization holds to Catholic doctrine on the sanctity of life and marriage. Senator Harris described these views as “extreme” and voted to reject Buescher’s appointment as a judge.

2. Senator Cory Booker’s attacks on judicial nominee Neomi Rao.

During Judge Rao’s confirmation hearing, Senator Booker questioned her ability to impartially apply the law if she supported her faith’s teaching on marriage. Ultimately, Senator Booker voted to reject Rao’s appointment as a judge. 

3. Senator Diane Feinstein’s attacks on judicial nominee Amy Coney Barrett. 

When Amy Coney Barrett was first nominated for a federal judgeship in 2017, Senator Feinstein took issue with her devout Catholic faith, stating: “The dogma lives loudly within you. And that’s of concern.” She, too, voted to reject Barrett’s appointment as a judge. 

Their position is clear: these senators will not permit certain people of faith to serve our nation unless those people bow to the senators’ political ideology. And they will impose a religious test to stop anyone who disagrees with them from joining the bench.

For a nation that was founded on the promises that we are all created equal and endowed with God-given rights, this is a huge problem. In America, public officeholders, including judges, should never be disqualified because of their faith. Listen to ADF General Counsel Kristen Waggoner explain why:

 

Our Constitution protects religious freedom for every American. It also requires that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.” 

Yet, this seems to be happening with increasing regularity. 

We must hold ourselves to a higher standard. Let’s be a nation that measures judges by their experience, not their religious beliefs. Let’s never tell someone they are disqualified for public service because of their faith. And let’s work together to fulfill our Constitution’s promise of true freedom and equality for all.

To learn more about how Alliance Defending Freedom is working to uphold the right of all people to peacefully live and work according to their beliefs, sign up for our newsletter.

SIGN UP


Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom

Non-profit organization

Alliance Defending Freedom advocates for your right to freely live out your faith


Culture

Should “Offensive” Speech Be Protected by Law?

It’s important to protect offensive speech so that the majority does not trample the minority.

Culture

To Curb Self-Censorship, We Must Realize How Much We All Dislike It

All across America, in every sector of society, cancel culture is being felt by people from all walks of life.

Culture

Antonin Scalia and Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Friendship: A Model for Our Times

Justices Ginsburg and Scalia modeled very well what it looks like to favor openness and debate even among those with whom we disagree.