Filter by
Search
Search Keywords
- Washington Supreme Court says govt can force people to create artistic expression, participate in events with which they disagree
- Multiple friend-of-the-court briefs filed at Washington Supreme Court in support of Barronelle Stutzman, Arlene’s Flowers
- Barronelle Stutzman, the sole owner of Arlene’s Flowers in Richland, Wash., has for her entire career served and employed people who identify as homosexual. Despite this, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Washington attorney general allege that she is guilty of unlawful discrimination because she acted consistent with her faith and declined to use her creative skills to beautify the same-sex ceremony of a long-time customer, Robert Ingersoll, and another man, Curt Freed.
- ADF attorneys file reply brief with Washington Supreme Court on behalf of Barronelle Stutzman, targeted for her beliefs.
- ADF asks Wash. high court to reverse lower court ruling against Barronelle Stutzman
- AG asked Barronelle Stutzman to pay $2,001, surrender her freedom
- ADF attorneys will appeal dangerous rulings
- New motions ask court to dismiss AG case against Arlene’s Flowers, stop state and ACLU from going after florist personally
- The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom Senior Legal Counsel Dale Schowengerdt regarding the answer Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys filed Monday to the ACLU lawsuit filed against Washington florist Barronelle Stutzman in Ingersoll v. Arlene’s Flowers: “Numerous florists are willing to assist in same-sex ceremonies, so the ACLU has no reason to try to force this florist to violate her deeply held beliefs. Arlene’s Flowers has both served and employed people who identify as homosexual. Barronelle Stutzman’s only desire is that she not be forced to violate her ...
- Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent Arlene’s Flowers