Skip to main content
Hero Image

The Ridiculous

January 28, 2010

ADF Center for Academic Freedom client Mike Adams posted an article today at that humorously highlights the ludicrous implications of the speech code at the University of Northern Colorado.  The speech code bans “inappropriate jokes,” meaning those motivated by any form of bias.  Of course, this leaves students wondering whether blonde jokes, Aggie jokes, political jokes, or even lawyer jokes are permitted on campus.  But then the speech code goes even further, banning anyone from “intentionally, recklessly, or negligently causing . . . emotional or mental harm to any person.”  Under this standard, does a student violate University policy simply by breaking up with his girlfriend?

But more importantly, Mike’s column highlights some of the fundamental constitutional problems with these speech codes, which are prevalent on campuses across the nation.  For one thing, these policies are so vague and expansive that no one really knows what they can and cannot say.  So they tend to be quiet, particularly on controversial issues.  For another, these policies penalize people if a listener gets (or pretends to be) offended.  Yet the First Amendment exists precisely to protect and foster a robust, unfettered exchange of ideas.  The Constitution does not protect people from being offended.  And it is high time for universities to prepare their students to live in a free society and to compete in the marketplace of ideas, rather than coddling them (and silencing them) with unconstitutional speech codes.

Alliance Defending Freedom

Alliance Defending Freedom

Non-profit organization

Alliance Defending Freedom advocates for your right to freely live out your faith

Religious Freedom

Watch: Why Georgia Tech Students Discriminated Against MLK Jr.'s Niece

You'd think that Martin Luther King Jr.'s Niece, Alveda King, would be warmly welcomed in MLK's home state of Georgia when she spoke at Georgia Tech last year. But you'd be wrong.

Religious Freedom

An Alarming Biden Rule Could Mean Opposite-Sex Roommates in College Dorms

Government officials are bound by the law—and forcing religious colleges to allow male students to live in girls’ dorms clearly violates the law.

Religious Freedom

This Lawsuit Threatens the Rights of Faith-Based Schools to Operate According to Their Beliefs

If successful, college students would be forbidden from using their federal tuition assistance at schools that proclaim widely held religious teachings on marriage, gender, and sexuality.