Have you ever shared your views on a sensitive topic with a friend via text message? How would you like to have that text conversation publicized for everyone to see?
The kicker is, Jack had nothing to be ashamed of. He treated everyone involved with dignity and respect.
Yet, because of his beliefs, Jack was the target of a smear campaign among his fellow students. Petitions were circulated calling on him to be removed as Student Senate President, a position he had been elected to in 2019. Jack listened to six hours of student comments berating him for his beliefs. And he was ultimately removed as Student Senate President.
All this because he dared to share his Catholic beliefs in a private conversation. Beliefs that he has the right to share under the First Amendment to our Constitution.
That’s why Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit in federal court against the university on Jack’s behalf. ADF is also advocating for Jack's constitutional rights within the Florida State University system.
University officials have a duty to uphold the Constitution on campus. But that is clearly not what happened at Florida State.
Thankfully, earlier this month a court acknowledged that Jack’s free speech rights were violated and ordered Florida State University to pay him as president of the Student Senate while the lawsuit continues. And then this week, the Student Supreme Court of Florida State University ruled that Jack should be reinstated to his position as Student Senate President.
To understand just how severely Jack’s constitutional rights were violated, let’s take a deeper look at the situation.
It all started with a private group chat for members of the Catholic Student Union, of which Jack is a part. In this chat, participants discussed the police shooting that caused the death of Tony McDade. One student encouraged others to watch a video link that directed ad revenue to organizations such as BlackLivesMatter.com, Reclaim the Block, and the ACLU.
Because of his Catholic beliefs, Jack had some concerns with these organizations and what they advocate for—including radical positions on abortion and transgenderism—so he responded.
Even if you disagree with Jack’s beliefs, it’s clear that Jack shared his viewpoint with humility and respect.
But despite this, some of his fellow students were angry.
Without Jack’s knowledge or permission, one participant of the Catholic Student Union chat leaked the conversation to a member of the Student Senate, of which Jack was the president. This student senator took Jack’s words out of context, falsely claiming that Jack called people who identify as LGBT “grave evils.”
And you know the rest. Petitions calling for Jack’s removal as Student Senate President. Six hours of comments. And a vote resulting in Jack being stripped of his title and his job.
But Jack has the right to free speech just like all the students who spoke in favor of his removal. And the university has a duty to uphold its students’ constitutional rights. Yet, Florida State officials refused to stop this gross violation of Jack’s rights and have kept enforcing the Student Senate’s removal.
We're grateful that the violation of Jack's rights has now been recognized on two different fronts:
- A federal court told the university to start paying him the compensation he would have received as the Student Senate President.
- The Student Supreme Court of Florida State University ruled that Jack was wrongfully removed from his position and ordered his reinstatement as president of the Student Senate.
The bottom line is that all students should be able to peacefully share their personal convictions without fear of retaliation.
And that’s what ADF will continue to advocate for at Florida State and on college campuses across the country.
To stay up to date on this case and others like it, sign up for our newsletter.
Religious FreedomThe Equality Act Risks the Rights of Every American
What many supporters of the bill won't tell you is that if passed, the Equality Act would pave the way for dangerous policies which could undermine fairness and freedom.
Religious FreedomWhy Two Female Athletes in Idaho Joined a Legal Battle Over a State Law
Female athletes deserve a voice in this lawsuit and the opportunity to protect women’s sports in Idaho.
Religious FreedomWill SCOTUS Protect NAACP v. Alabama's Legacy? 5 Clues From Monday's Arguments
Much like Alabama’s demand back in 1956, California’s demand will also have disastrous consequences for donor privacy, free speech, and free association.