Skip to main content
Supreme Court of the United States

Hawaii Passes Law that Forces Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers to Advocate for Abortion

By Sarah Kramer posted on:
October 17, 2017

There is a disturbing trend of states attempting to force pro-life pregnancy centers to promote abortion. The latest example comes from Hawaii, where a new law forces pregnancy centers in the state to promote and advertise a website where women can go for abortion coverage.

In response, Alliance Defending Freedom filed a lawsuit representing A Place for Women in Waipoi and five other pregnancy resource centers affiliated with the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA). ADF is challenging similar laws in California and Illinois. 

Calvary Chapel Pearl Harbor, a local church, operates A Place for Women in Waipio in its church building as part of its ministry. It offers “women of all ages a safe and supportive environment where they can seek information on the myriad of matters surrounding pregnancy and other women's issues.” It exists to care for the women who walk through the door and their unborn babies, not to promote a procedure that threatens psychological and physical harm to the mother and ends the baby’s life.

The Hawaii law requires medical and non-medical pregnancy centers to post a disclaimer that Hawaii has “family planning” programs, including free or low-cost contraceptives and other pregnancy-related services. At the least, pregnancy centers must provide the website where women can find information on these “family planning” services. And while the disclaimer does not explicitly mention abortion, Hawaii’s Medicaid program lists it as one of their services (despite the fact that ending a baby’s life has nothing to do with planning a family).

It appears that this law directly targets Hawaii’s pro-life pregnancy centers.

The law states that health care facilities that provide “comprehensive health care” are exempt from the law, though it doesn’t define what that means – leaving it to the state’s discretion. That leaves the state free to exempt abortionists like Planned Parenthood that also provide some other limited services.

For pregnancy centers dedicated to promoting life, this completely undermines their mission. And it violates their right not to be compelled to speak a message that contradicts their faith.

On top of that, the law allows private citizens to sue if a pregnancy center does not immediately place such a disclaimer on their premises. That means pro-abortion organizations like Planned Parenthood and NARAL could file a lawsuit against a pregnancy center as soon as this law takes effect – which is not such a far-fetched possibility, considering that pro-abortion organizations view pregnancy resource centers as a threat.

Our Constitution ensures the right to free speech, including the right not to be forced to speak messages that violate our convictions. It should concern all of us that a state can force pro-life pregnancy centers to advocate for procedures that undermine their very reason for existing.


The State Should Never Force Pro-Life Pregnancy Centers to Advocate for Abortion


ADF is standing by these pregnancy resource centers and pro-life healthcare professionals to ensure that they are not compelled to speak a message that undermines their very mission and contradicts their ethical and religious beliefs.

To stay up to date on this case and others like it – including a case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court – sign up for our newsletter.

Sign Me Up

Sarah Kramer

Sarah Kramer

Digital Content Specialist

Sarah worked as an investigative reporter before joining the Alliance Defending Freedom team.

Woman typing blog posts 2021
Check Out Five of Our Most-Read Articles of 2021

With 2021 in the books, it’s a good time to reflect on the highlights of the year.

Fighting for free speech at the Supreme Court
Free Speech Is a Human Right

A nation’s freedom is measured partly by the amount of speech its government tolerates.

303 Lorie Smith at Supreme Court Religious Freedom
Can the Government Force You to Speak? This 10th Circuit Decision Says “Yes”

Working with ADF attorneys, Lorie Smith’s case currently awaits a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, after a lower court ruled against her earlier this year.