active U.S. Supreme Court

L.M. v. Town of Middleborough

L.M. v. Town of Middleborough

Summary

Seventh grader Liam Morrison wore a T-shirt to Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Massachusetts, that said, “There are only two genders.” The principal of the school, along with a school counselor, pulled Liam out of class and ordered him to remove his shirt. After Liam politely declined, school officials said that he must remove the shirt or he could not return to class. As a result, Liam left school and missed the rest of his classes that day.

Commentary

Case Documents

Court
Title
Date
U.S. Supreme Court
11/12/2024
U.S. Supreme Court
11/12/2024
Appellate Court
12/18/2023
Appellate Court
10/2/2023
Appellate Court
10/2/2023
Appellate Court
10/2/2023
Appellate Court
10/2/2023
Appellate Court
9/25/2023
Trial Court
8/4/2023
Trial Court
7/19/2023
Trial Court
5/19/2023

FAQs

What did Liam Morrison’s shirt say? +

In March 2023, Liam wore a t-shirt with the words, “There are only two genders,” written on the front. He was removed from his first class by the school principal, who told him he must change his shirt to remain in class. Liam did not wish to change his shirt, so the school contacted his father, who picked him up and took him home for the rest of the day.

A couple of months later, Liam wore a shirt to school with a similar message, except the words “two genders” were replaced with the word “censored.” Together, this shirt read, “There are censored genders.” The principal again told Liam to change his shirt, and Liam complied so that he did not miss another day of class.

Is there court precedent regarding a student’s right to wear clothing expressing a message in public schools? +

Yes. In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, a group of students were sent home from school for wearing black armbands meant to signify their support for a truce in the Vietnam War. The students’ families sued the school, and the Supreme Court ruled that the school had indeed violated the First Amendment by censoring the students’ speech. In the majority opinion, the Court clarified that students and teachers do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” In Liam’s case, the actions of Nichols Middle School officials directly contradict this ruling.

How did Nichols Middle School treat other students who wore clothing expressing messages? +

Almost every school day, multiple students wear clothing that expresses messages about a variety of topics. Regarding the issues of gender identity and sexual orientation, Nichols Middle School even hosts a “Pride Week” in which students are encouraged to wear clothing expressing support for LGBT ideology. But when Liam wore a shirt expressing a different view on these issues, the school punished him.

What is Alliance Defending Freedom asking the court to do in L.M. v. Town of Middleborough? +

ADF attorneys are asking the court to issue an order prohibiting the Town of Middleborough and the Middleborough School Committee from illegally censoring Liam’s speech. In addition, we are asking the court to declare the speech policy that Nichols Middle School used to censor Liam unconstitutional.

Case Profiles


David A. Cortman

David A. Cortman

Senior Counsel, Vice President of U.S. Litigation

View Profile

John Bursch

John Bursch

Senior Counsel, Vice President of Appellate Advocacy

View Profile

To top