Skip to content

ADF attorney to argue before MA high court in favor of upholding protections for terminally ill, disabled

ADF attorneys available to media following oral arguments
Kligler v. Healey

WHO: Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys

WHAT: Available for media interviews following oral arguments in Kligler v. Healey

WHEN: Immediately after hearing, which begins at 9 a.m. EST, Wednesday, March 9

WHERE: Outside Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, One Pemberton Square, Boston; hearing is also available by live-stream. Media not attending in person may contact ADF Media Relations Specialist Bernadette Tasy at (480) 356-0324 to schedule an interview.

BOSTON – Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys will be available for media interviews Wednesday immediately following oral arguments at the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Kligler v. Healey, a case involving the commonwealth’s prohibition of physician-assisted suicide. On Monday, the court granted ADF attorneys’ request to participate in oral arguments on behalf of Euthanasia Prevention Coalition USA after they filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the commonwealth’s protections for the terminally ill and disabled.

ADF attorneys are asking the court to uphold the Massachusetts law prohibiting physician-assisted suicide and to preserve the “well settled” distinction between “withdrawing or refusing life-sustaining medical treatment” and “attempting suicide.”

“Doctors and medicine are supposed to help and heal, not kill,” said ADF Senior Counsel Chris Schandevel, who will argue before the court. “Assisted suicide radically changes the foundation of practicing medicine. Any law that abandons healing and turns to killing puts the weak and most vulnerable patients at risk and corrupts and degrades medicine. Massachusetts’ law protecting these disadvantaged patients should therefore be affirmed. Patients deserve doctors who will support them through their illnesses, not offer them a ‘quick exit’ through immediate death.”

As the friend-of-the-court brief filed in the case explained, those challenging Massachusetts’ protections for the terminally ill “seek to establish a previously unrecognized right to ‘medical aid in dying,’ where a doctor prescribes lethal medication for use in committing suicide. But the widespread prohibition—not acceptance—of assisted suicide is deeply rooted in Massachusetts’ and the Nation’s history and tradition. And the vast majority of states and secular medical associations still oppose it today.”

“Creating a right to physician-assisted suicide would not be a mere expansion of the right to refuse life-saving treatment,” the brief continued. “The right to reject treatment is based on the common-law right to reject a battery. And death occurs, if at all, by natural causes. Assisted suicide is different: it invites the intrusion of a lethal agent into the patient’s body, intentionally causing death.”

Euthanasia Prevention Coalition USA is a national network that opposes euthanasia and assisted suicide, supporting positive measures to improve the quality of life of people and their families.

  • Pronunciation guide: Schandevel (SHAN’-da-vel)


Alliance Defending Freedom is an alliance-building, non-profit legal organization committed to protecting religious freedom, free speech, parental rights, and the sanctity of life.


# # #