Skip to content
Won U.S. District Courts

Austin LifeCare v. City of Austin

Catholic Hospitals Are Right, Abortion is Rarely Medically Necessary


In April 2010, with lobbying from abortion advocates, the Austin City Council passed an ordinance to restrict the operations of pro-life pregnancy centers, which help women to choose birth but do not promote abortion. The ordinance required two signs, one in English and one in Spanish, to be displayed at the entrance to each center stating: “This center does not provide abortions or refer to abortion providers. This center does not provide or refer to providers of U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved birth control drugs and medical devices.’”

Alliance Defending Freedom filed suit on behalf of Austin LifeCare challenging the ordinance under the First Amendment. In response, on January 26, 2012, the City of Austin repealed and replaced the ordinance. The new ordinance requires pregnancy centers to “prominently display a black and white sign, in English and in Spanish, affixed to the entrance of the center so that the sign is conspicuously visible to a person entering the center, that accurately discloses the following information: (i) whether the center provides medical services; (ii) if the center provides medical services, whether all medical services are provided under direction and supervision of a licensed health care provider; and (iii) if the center provides medical services, whether the center is licensed by a state or federal regulatory entity to provide those services…”

The replacement ordinance continues to violate the First Amendment rights of pregnancy centers in the City of Austin by coercing nonprofit pregnancy centers to speak the government’s message in a manner intended to discourage women from seeking help by pregnancy centers. “Pregnancy centers, which offer real help and hope to women, shouldn’t be punished by political allies of the abortion industry,” said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Bowman. “The city should recognize that using a sleight-of-hand to force pro-life centers to post the message the city wants does not solve the First Amendment problems with the law. Courts around the country have been striking these types of laws down.”

Thanks to the lawsuit, Austin’s ordinance was permanently enjoined from enforcement by the United States District Court in June 2014.

What's at stake

The ability of pro-life pregnancy centers to provide effective services in Austin, Texas

The freedom of non-profits to select the messages they want to convey without government coercion

Our role in this case

Alliance Defending Freedom has partnered with allies at Texas Center for Defense of Life and Jubilee Campaign-Law of Life Project to represent Austin LifeCare, Inc. free of charge.

Case Documents

Case Profiles

Matt Bowman
Matt Bowman
Senior Counsel, Director of Regulatory Practice
Matt Bowman serves as senior counsel and director of regulatory practice at Alliance Defending Freedom, where he focuses on the impact of administrative law on religious freedom, the sanctity of life, and family.