Dr. Allan Josephson was the Division Chief of the Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology at the University of Louisville for nearly 15 years. When he arrived at the school in 2003, he took over a struggling program. But after many years of careful research and hard work, he helped it become nationally renowned, and the university greatly benefited from Dr. Josephson’s work.
But sadly, Dr. Josephson’s amazing career at the University of Louisville came to an unexpected end.
In October of 2017, Dr. Josephson contributed to a panel discussion on gender dysphoria at the Heritage Foundation, a nationally-known think tank in Washington, D.C. There, Dr. Josephson expressed his professional view on treatments for childhood gender dysphoria.
What Dr. Josephson said on this panel led to his firing from the university. What could he have possibly said to elicit such a reaction?
Dr. Josephson expressed his view that medical professionals should seek to understand and treat the psychological issues that often cause this confusion, rather than rushing children into more radical, aggressive treatments like puberty-blocking drugs and cross-sex hormones.
Speaking as a psychiatrist with over 35 years of experience, Dr. Josephson argued that children are not mature enough to make permanent, life-altering decisions of any kind, let alone medical ones such as this. And as other professionals in the field have pointed out, 80 to 95 percent of children who say they experience gender dysphoria naturally come to accept their biological sex over time.
This made some university faculty and staff members very unhappy with Dr. Josephson.
It did not matter that his statements at the Heritage Foundation were backed with science. Nor did it matter that Dr. Josephson was expressing his personal views as an experienced professional at an off-campus event.
Just a few weeks after the panel discussion, Dr. Josephson was demoted to the role of a junior faculty member. For the next year he was subjected to a hostile environment and belittling assignments. Then in February 2019, the university informed him that it would not renew his contract.
Dr. Josephson was fired for what he said.
As Dr. Josephson points out, some in the scientific community are silencing professionals like himself on this topic in a way that would not occur in any other field.
Children who experience gender dysphoria need help. But as the medical community debates how best to treat these children, silencing professionals like Dr. Josephson helps no one. Dr. Josephson’s colleagues have a right to disagree with his professional views. But Dr. Josephson has a right to express those views.
“Universities should welcome differing viewpoints and encourage civil discourse in their academic communities,” said ADF Senior Counsel Tyson Langhofer, director of the ADF Center for Academic Freedom. “Speaking with conservative groups—or holding conservative views—should not be disqualifying for academic service. Unfortunately, the University of Louisville’s attempts to silence Dr. Josephson shut down debate and do a disservice to students and faculty alike.”
That’s why ADF has filed a complaint in federal court to defend the rights of Dr. Josephson and other professors like him. Dr. Josephson is an expert in his field. He was simply contributing to the public discussion on an important issue and trying to help people in doing so. Publicly funded universities aren’t required to praise Dr. Josephson for his views, but they should be prohibited from punishing him.
Religious FreedomWatch: Why Georgia Tech Students Discriminated Against MLK Jr.'s Niece
You'd think that Martin Luther King Jr.'s Niece, Alveda King, would be warmly welcomed in MLK's home state of Georgia when she spoke at Georgia Tech last year. But you'd be wrong.
Religious FreedomAn Alarming Biden Rule Could Mean Opposite-Sex Roommates in College Dorms
Government officials are bound by the law—and forcing religious colleges to allow male students to live in girls’ dorms clearly violates the law.
Religious FreedomThis Lawsuit Threatens the Rights of Faith-Based Schools to Operate According to Their Beliefs
If successful, college students would be forbidden from using their federal tuition assistance at schools that proclaim widely held religious teachings on marriage, gender, and sexuality.