Marriage defenders ask U.S. Supreme Court to hear Calif. Prop. 8 case
Attorney sound bite: Austin R. Nimocks
Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys are part of the legal defense team for ProtectMarriage.com, the banner organization for the official proponents and campaign committee of Proposition 8.
“Marriage is a universal good that has been honored by diverse cultures and faiths for the entire history of Western Civilization,” said Senior Legal Counsel Austin R. Nimocks. “The Protectmarriage.com legal team looks forward to standing before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the people’s right to preserve this fundamental building block of civilization. The democratic process and the most important human institution--marriage--shouldn’t be overthrown based on the demands of Hollywood activists.”
On Feb. 7, two judges on a three-judge 9th Circuit panel in Perry v. Brown upheld a federal district judge’s decision ruling that California’s marriage amendment violates the U.S. Constitution.
“The Supreme Court has made it very clear that the age-old definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman is constitutional as a matter of state public policy,” explained lead counsel Charles J. Cooper with the Cooper & Kirk law firm. “The lower court decisions essentially rejected all relevant Supreme Court and appellate court precedent while attacking the character and judgment of millions of Californians. We are hopeful and confident that the Supreme Court will grant review and ultimately uphold its precedent and the will of the people.”
The petition asking the Supreme Court to review the case explains, “The Ninth Circuit’s charge of anti-gay animus is…at war with its own acknowledgment that the question whether marriage should be redefined to include same-sex couples is one ‘over which people of good will may disagree.’… The Ninth Circuit’s charge thus defames over seven million California voters and countless other Americans who believe that traditional marriage continues to serve society’s legitimate interests, including the citizens and lawmakers of at least 41 States, the Members of Congress and President who supported enactment of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, the large majority of state and federal judges who have addressed the issue, and until very recently President Obama.”
The petition warns of the potential effect if the 9th Circuit’s ruling is allowed to stand: “It is thus all but certain that the decision below, despite its professed narrowness, will in due course lead to States throughout the Circuit being forced to redefine marriage by judicial decree.”
- Pronunciation guide: Nimocks (NIM’-ucks)