ADF Logo
Won U.S. Supreme Court

Olivier v. Brandon, MS

A man stands outdoors reading his Bible in front of a crowd of people

Summary

Gabriel Olivier is a Christian street preacher in Brandon, Mississippi, who believes that sharing his faith in public is an important part of living it out. After being arrested and fined for preaching near a city amphitheater in violation of a local ordinance restricting protests and demonstrations in that area, Gabriel wanted to return—but without the threat of criminal punishment. He filed a lawsuit, claiming the ordinance violated the First Amendment and sought an injunction to prevent the city from enforcing it against him in the future. At stake was a fundamental question: Can the government use a prior conviction to permanently bar a citizen from challenging an unconstitutional law in federal court?

Both the federal district court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled against Gabriel, holding that his lawsuit was barred by the Supreme Court’s 1994 decision in Heck v. Humphrey, which bars plaintiffs from using federal civil rights law to challenge a prior criminal conviction. Eight of the 5th Circuit’s seventeen judges dissented from that ruling, calling it “indefensible.” The Supreme Court heard Gabriel’s case in December 2025.

Alliance Defending Freedom filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of Chike Uzuegbunam—ADF’s former client in the landmark case Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski (2021). Like Gabriel, Chike is a Christian street preacher who had faced similar government censorship of his faith-based speech. ADF’s brief argued that the 5th Circuit’s reading of Heck would leave ordinary citizens who were fined, rather than imprisoned, with no meaningful way to challenge those restrictions in federal court.

On March 20, 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously reversed the 5th Circuit’s decision in an opinion written by Justice Kagan. The Court held that Heck does not bar a lawsuit seeking purely prospective relief—a court order preventing future enforcement of a law—even when the plaintiff was previously convicted under that same law. Americans like Gabriel now have a clear path to challenge unconstitutional laws in federal court, even after being punished for violating them.