Skip to content
Image
“Just Who do We Think We Are?”

Smith v. Bishop | Bishop v. United States

Last Updated

What's at stake

Protecting marriage as the union of one man and one woman

Promoting the importance of both mothers and fathers

Protecting the voters’ rights to direct social policy concerning marriage and family

Summary

Over a million Oklahoma voters approved a constitutional amendment that defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman. Alliance Defending Freedom and the Tulsa District Attorney’s Office became the primary defenders of Oklahoma’s marriage amendment when two same-sex couples sued Sally Howe Smith, the Tulsa County Clerk. The couples asked a federal court to force the Tulsa Clerk to give them marriage licenses in violation of Oklahoma law.

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys explained to the court that marriage benefits society by providing children with stable family relationships and the unique parenting benefits that both a mother and a father bring. But a federal district judge ruled in January 2014 that Oklahoma’s definition of marriage violated the U.S. Constitution, despite the fact that diverse cultures and faiths have used the same definition for centuries.

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys, on behalf of the Tulsa Clerk, appealed that decision to the Tenth Circuit. Alliance Defending Freedom and its allies will continue to defend Oklahoma’s marriage laws, as well as the man-woman marriage laws in many other states throughout the nation.

Our role in this case

Alliance Defending Freedom and its allies are defending Oklahoma’s marriage amendment free of charge.

Legal Documents

Court
Title
Date
U.S. Supreme Court
8/6/2014
Appellate Court
7/18/2014
Appellate Court
2/24/2014
Trial Court
1/14/2014