CASEReddy v. Foster

Client Story


Share this page
Summary
A New Hampshire law allows the creation of 25-foot zones in which no person may speak, stand, or even enter on public ways and sidewalks outside of abortion facilities. The law explicitly exempts abortion facility escorts, allowing such individuals to engage in speech and expressive activities favorable to abortion—encouraging and compelling women to enter the abortion facilities and continue with the abortions—while prohibiting pro-life advocates from engaging in any expressive activity within the zones.
News Releases

1st Circuit sidesteps ruling on constitutionality of NH censorship zones

Sanctity of Life

1st Circuit sidesteps ruling on constitutionality of NH censorship zones

The following quote may be attributed to Alliance Defending Freedom allied attorney Michael Tierney.

Jan 12, 2017 Read More

ADF to 1st Circuit: NH law creating censorship zones must go

Sanctity of Life

ADF to 1st Circuit: NH law creating censorship zones must go

ADF attorney, allied attorney available to media following oral arguments Thursday

Dec 07, 2016 Read More

Court order freezes NH censorship zone law

Sanctity of Life

Court order freezes NH censorship zone law

Order stops enforcement of 25-foot non-speech areas around abortion facilities

Jul 24, 2014 Read More

NH anti-speech zone law temporarily suspended

Sanctity of Life

NH anti-speech zone law temporarily suspended

ADF official comment

Jul 09, 2014 Read More

ADF files suit against NH anti-speech zone similar to one US Supreme Court struck down

Sanctity of Life

ADF files suit against NH anti-speech zone similar to one US Supreme Court struck down

Zone creates 25-foot non-speech area around abortion facilities

Jul 08, 2014 Read More
Share this page
Documents
https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/docs/default-source/documents/case-documents/reddy-v.-foster/reddy-v-foster---1st-circuit-opinion.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/docs/default-source/documents/case-documents/reddy-v.-foster/reddy-v-foster---opening-brief-on-appeal.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/docs/default-source/documents/case-documents/reddy-v.-foster/reddy-v-foster---dismissal-order.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/documents/reddy-v-foster---stay-order.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/documents/reddy-v-foster---temporary-restraining-order.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/documents/reddy-v-foster---brief-in-support-of-motion-for-temporary-restraining-order-and-preliminary-injunction.pdf?sfvrsn=4https://adflegal.blob.core.windows.net/web-content-dev/docs/default-source/documents/case-documents/reddy-v.-foster/reddy-v-foster---complaint.pdf?sfvrsn=6
Court Title Date
Appellate Court
1st Circuit opinion Jan 11 2017
Appellate Court
Opening brief on appeal Aug 01 2016
Trial Court
Dismissal order Mar 31 2016
Trial Court
Stay order Jul 23 2014
Trial Court
Temporary restraining order Jul 09 2014
Trial Court
Brief in support of motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction Jul 07 2014
Trial Court
Complaint Jul 07 2014

Commentary

Resources

Bio: Michael Tierney

Biographies

Media Documents

Related Cases

McCullen v. Coakley

Jun 26, 2014